Blog Post

Relationships Later in Life

Debbie Bryan-Lamb • Apr 28, 2020


Given New Zealand’s ever increasing divorce rates how can you protect your property against a Property (Relationships) Act claim, when entering into 2nd, 3rd or subsequent relationships later in life? Whilst younger people entering into a first time relationship, usually have less and lower valued assets (and sometimes greater debt), people entering into subsequent relationships later in life, represent a special demographic with unique legal needs. Such parties often hold higher value assets/debts and may also have children from a previous relationship(s).

So What Are The Property (Relationships) Act Rules?

If you are a couple (i.e. de facto, married or living in a civil union relationship) for at least a three year period (known as a “qualifying” relationship”), the Property (Relationships) Act will apply. Should your relationship later come to an end, due to either separation or the death of one or both parties, the property acquired during the relationship will be divided equally. In contrast, property acquired prior to the commencement of the relationship will typically remain the separate property of the party who owns it – except for the family home which will automatically be treated as “relationship property” regardless of when it was acquired, which will be subject to division under the Act.

Unless a pre-nuptial Agreement or Contracting Out Agreement is entered into between the parties to identify what assets/liabilities the parties agree will remain their respective separate or relationship property, the equal sharing provisions of the Property (Relationships) Act can have very serious and often unintended financial implications. Such implications later in life, can involve the risk of having to find sufficient funds (and/or having to sell off hard earned assets) to pay out a half share of such assets to an ex partner, or to the representatives of your ex partner’s estate.

Take The Following Example:

Jack and Jill meet and fall in love. They marry and have 3 children. They separate 12 years later. Jill pays Jack out for his half share of their relationship property assets, with Jill retaining their family home as part of their settlement. Some 4 years later, Jill enters into a new relationship with James. No pre-nuptial or Contracting Out Agreement is entered into by the parties before or after James moves into Jill’s home, to live with her and the children from Jill’s previous relationship, despite Jill having always intended to leave the family home as a legacy to her 3 children. A further 5 years goes by, then sadly Jill unexpectedly passes away.

Can James make a claim against Jill’s estate, for a half share of the family home where they resided together? Yes James could make a claim against Jill’s estate. If his claim succeeded, James would likely be awarded a 50% share of the value of the family home, leaving Jill’s surviving children to receive the remaining 50% share of the family home between them. This could happen regardless of whether or not, Jill leaves provision for James in her Will because after Jill passes away, under section 61 of the Property (Relationships) Act, James is able to elect either option A or B. Such provisions allow James to elect to inherit whatver Jill may have made provision for him in her Will, or James could elect to make an application for division of property under the Act – whichever way it’s up to James to decide. Alternatively, if James passed away then the same options would apply to Jill in relation to James’ estate.

Should Jill and James both pass away, or if James passed away shortly after Jill, then each of their representatives could still pursue a claim on behalf of their respective estates, with such proceedings usually costing significant legal fees and delays before their estates would be finalised and assets distributed.

Lessons To Learn?

Had Jill and James entered into a pre nuptial (or Contracting Out Agreement) such an agreement would specifically record what each of them wished to retain as their separate property and what property would be divided as relationship property (usually equally) under the Property (Relationships) Act. To be valid, such an agreement needs to comply with the requirements as set out in the Act including:

a)The Agreement must be in writing;

b)Both parties must sign the Agreement;

c)Each of the parties’ signatures must be witnessed by a lawyer; and

d)Each of the parties must receive independent legal advice.

Note – such an Agreement can be put in place at any time before, during or after the relationship becomes subject to the qualifying provisions of the Property (Relationships) Act. Once signed and certified by two independent lawyers, such an Agreement takes effect immediately. Prior to living with a new partner for a 3 year period (and just in case one partner who may own lower valued assets then refuses to enter into a Contracting Out Agreement), it’s very wise to take sound legal advice and enter into a formal Agreement well before your relationship becomes subject to the Act. If you need assistance please contact one of the team at Ward Adams Bryan-Lamb. Solicitors on (03) 218 2833.

By Nicola McLeish 17 Aug, 2023
The partners are delighted to announce that Jonathon Amtmann has been promoted to Associate of the firm.
The Fencing Act
By Jonathon Amtmann 16 Aug, 2023
The Fencing Act 1978 (“the Act”) deals with boundary fences between neighbours. Read on to find out all you need to know when erecting a boundary fence.
By Roosje Rabusa 23 Nov, 2022
With the use of social media and online platforms becoming more and more prevalent in our daily lives, it is also becoming easier for people to use these platforms as a way to inflict psychological and verbal abuse or harm on other people. Individuals are now able to use online platforms to create fake profiles, post, threaten, and stalk people as a form of psychological harm. It is even becoming increasingly common for people to send messages by entering text into the reference box in a bank transfer. Individuals are becoming more creative, so it is important that we are aware of the risks of harm, and take the necessary steps to avoid such behaviour from continuing. Under the Family Violence Act 2018, such online behaviour may constitute “family violence” and an application to the Family Court for a Protection Order may be necessary. In order to make an application under this Act, you and the person exerting this harmful behaviour (the Respondent) must have been in a “family relationship”. The Respondent may be a current or previous spouse or partner, or a family member. You may wish to seek special conditions to be included in the Protection Order should the Court grant one. This may include that the Respondent must take all reasonable steps to remove harmful material about you from social media. If you are not in a “family relationship”, an application can be made in the District Court under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015. In contrast to an application under the Family Violence Act 2018, for an order to be granted under this Act, it must be satisfied that the other party had intention to cause you harm, and such communication would cause harm to a reasonable person and did cause you harm. If successful, the Court may make orders against the other party including taking down or disabling the material, ceasing or refraining from the conduct concerned, or publishing an apology. This Act is narrow and more targeted, and is not likely to result in quick or efficient redress compared to the Family Violence Act 2018. In any event, it is important that you put necessary measures in place to stop this behaviour from continuing including not sharing your passwords, disabling GPS tracking on online platforms, blocking others on social media, and making a complaint to the relevant agencies.
By Debbie Bryan-Lamb 12 Oct, 2022
Looking to buy your first home but having to rely on Mum and Dad to cough up some money? How would that work and what risks do you need to be aware of?
By Debbie Bryan-Lamb 27 Sep, 2022
Four important legal documents essential in most people’s lives include having a: • Will; • Enduring Powers of Attorney (Property and Personal Care and Welfare); • Family Trust; and • Relationship Property Agreement.
By Debbie Bryan-Lamb 07 Sep, 2022
Question – do you want to have peace of mind about what will happen to your property if you die or separate from your partner? If you answered “yes” then yes you definitely need a pre-nup agreement.
By Debbie Bryan-Lamb 03 Aug, 2022
If you are already living together as a couple or you are planning on moving in together, you need to get sound advice from an experienced lawyer specializing in relationship property matters. Right from the outset you need to understand the implications “living together” may have for your separate property rights.
By Jonathon Amtmann 27 Jul, 2022
The Wills Act 2007 sets out specific requirements Will documents must follow in order to be valid.
By Roosje Rabusa 10 Mar, 2022
When a partner or spouse acquires property from a third party by way of survivorship (or death), that property will be separate property.
By Roosje Rabusa 17 Feb, 2022
As a general rule, gifts between partners or spouses (known as “interspousal gifts”) are not classified as relationship property - unless such gifts are used for the benefit of both parties or that is the intention.
More Posts
Share by: